<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Us Versus Them &#8211; Why Do We Always Get Here?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danhocking.com/2009/04/us-versus-them-why-do-we-always-get-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danhocking.com/2009/04/us-versus-them-why-do-we-always-get-here/</link>
	<description>Opinions on... just about everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:14:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KenGHarrison</title>
		<link>http://www.danhocking.com/2009/04/us-versus-them-why-do-we-always-get-here/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>KenGHarrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danhocking.com/?p=93#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Interesting insights as always Dan - one thing I would also bring up is that when it comes to communities that have a cause to work towards, be it big or small, there will be those who lose sight of this cause and make themselves the cause - for monetary, social, or personal gain in general.

This is often what will contribute to cracks in the faction - dissension will arise when decisions are made that favour the group&#039;s cause rather than the cause of the individual(s).  

Big examples of this are using charity work solely for networking, using Twitter to assert your own popularity, using WLUSU to... well you and I could have another full discussion on that, couldn&#039;t we. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insights as always Dan &#8211; one thing I would also bring up is that when it comes to communities that have a cause to work towards, be it big or small, there will be those who lose sight of this cause and make themselves the cause &#8211; for monetary, social, or personal gain in general.</p>
<p>This is often what will contribute to cracks in the faction &#8211; dissension will arise when decisions are made that favour the group&#8217;s cause rather than the cause of the individual(s).  </p>
<p>Big examples of this are using charity work solely for networking, using Twitter to assert your own popularity, using WLUSU to&#8230; well you and I could have another full discussion on that, couldn&#8217;t we. <img src='http://www.danhocking.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.danhocking.com/2009/04/us-versus-them-why-do-we-always-get-here/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danhocking.com/?p=93#comment-777</guid>
		<description>&quot;Us versus them&quot; is 100% evident in the single big but not so happy community that is Twitter. By Twitter, I really just mean the social media community.

We sometimes take stands against celebrities and regulars getting on to our tools or introducing their own ideas into the mix... it&#039;s the &quot;we were here first, do as we say noob&quot; phenomenon.

I&#039;ve done it myself.

Even worse is when we, as this community, take arms against brands taking presence in new areas on the interwebs.  It&#039;s worse because it&#039;s people like us that convinced them to, did the work, and are executing it.

--

Your example of the student union is bang on, because I see a lot similar with MESA at U of T that I was deeply involved in.  I&#039;ve sent this post off to their senior team to consider, as they&#039;re beginning to break the association into multiple goal-based groups (VS. one big banner) with an umbrella unity.

--

You&#039;re still off your rocker, in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Us versus them&#8221; is 100% evident in the single big but not so happy community that is Twitter. By Twitter, I really just mean the social media community.</p>
<p>We sometimes take stands against celebrities and regulars getting on to our tools or introducing their own ideas into the mix&#8230; it&#8217;s the &#8220;we were here first, do as we say noob&#8221; phenomenon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done it myself.</p>
<p>Even worse is when we, as this community, take arms against brands taking presence in new areas on the interwebs.  It&#8217;s worse because it&#8217;s people like us that convinced them to, did the work, and are executing it.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Your example of the student union is bang on, because I see a lot similar with MESA at U of T that I was deeply involved in.  I&#8217;ve sent this post off to their senior team to consider, as they&#8217;re beginning to break the association into multiple goal-based groups (VS. one big banner) with an umbrella unity.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re still off your rocker, in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by skanwar</title>
		<link>http://www.danhocking.com/2009/04/us-versus-them-why-do-we-always-get-here/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by skanwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danhocking.com/?p=93#comment-776</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by skanwar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by skanwar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
